gpt-5.2 vs llama-3.3-70b
OpenAI against Cerebras, priced on the same four workloads with price book 2026-10-22.
On real workloads
| Workload | gpt-5.2 per call | llama-3.3-70b per call | Monthly difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply 1,500 input and 400 output tokens, 100,000 calls a month |
$0.00822 | $0.00176 | −$647.00 |
| RAG answer, cached context 2,000 fresh + 4,000 cached input, 500 output, 100,000 calls a month |
$0.01 | $0.0057 | −$550.00 |
| Agent step 4,000 fresh + 8,000 cached input, 800 output, 250,000 calls a month |
$0.02 | $0.01 | −$2,110.00 |
| Batch summary 3,000 input and 300 output tokens via the Batch API, 1,000,000 calls a month |
$0.00473 | — | — |
Monthly difference is llama-3.3-70b minus gpt-5.2. Batch rows use each provider's Batch API rates where published. Price both on your own workload.
Rates
| Model | Input | Output | Cache read | Cache write | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| openai/gpt-5.2 | $1.75 | $14.00 | $0.175 | — | 272K |
| cerebras/llama-3.3-70b | $0.85 | $1.20 | — | — | 128K |
Price is one input. Before switching, run your own prompts through both and compare quality; then veqen diff prices the change at your production volume.