gpt-5.2 vs gemini-3.5-flash
OpenAI against Google Gemini, priced on the same four workloads with price book 2026-10-22.
On real workloads
| Workload | gpt-5.2 per call | gemini-3.5-flash per call | Monthly difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reply 1,500 input and 400 output tokens, 100,000 calls a month |
$0.00822 | $0.00585 | −$237.50 |
| RAG answer, cached context 2,000 fresh + 4,000 cached input, 500 output, 100,000 calls a month |
$0.01 | $0.0081 | −$310.00 |
| Agent step 4,000 fresh + 8,000 cached input, 800 output, 250,000 calls a month |
$0.02 | $0.01 | −$1,300.00 |
| Batch summary 3,000 input and 300 output tokens via the Batch API, 1,000,000 calls a month |
$0.00473 | $0.0036 | −$1,125.00 |
Monthly difference is gemini-3.5-flash minus gpt-5.2. Batch rows use each provider's Batch API rates where published. Price both on your own workload.
Rates
| Model | Input | Output | Cache read | Cache write | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| openai/gpt-5.2 | $1.75 | $14.00 | $0.175 | — | 272K |
| google/gemini-3.5-flash | $1.50 | $9.00 | $0.15 | — | 1M |
Price is one input. Before switching, run your own prompts through both and compare quality; then veqen diff prices the change at your production volume.